About Us

  • Gallomanor provides creative audience-led communication solutions and events to local government and other organisations. We specialise in citizen engagement campaigns and e-democracy.
  • Contact Us
    email: info@gallomanor.com
    tel: 01225 869413
    fax: 0870 7627 451
    post:
    31 Silver Street
    Bradford on Avon
    Wiltshire
    BA15 1JX

eDemocracy Calendar

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Local Democracy

  • Local Democracy Campaign

June 23, 2009

The buying of the President - Jim Margolis

Trying to get into Parliament that day after a new speaker had been elected might not have been the best of ideas, but I certainly wasn't alone in trying and that was the problem. So by the time I managed to walk all the way to the rather grand committee room 2, Jim Margolis had already started.

Jim helped get Bill Clinton elected in 1992 and he was a senior advisor to Barack Obama's campaign.  His expertise is TV advertsing.

In April I got to watch and speak with Sam Graham Felsen (@samgf) from Blue State Digital as part of the G20Voice project I managed.  SGF was Obama's campaign blogger and it was fascinating to see the two sides of the campaign presented separately.

The campaign made some fabulous ads - I expected the Eye of the Tiger to start blaring out on one it was so pumped up.  They spent $450m on TV spots, but two things stuck out for me from his presentation.

Obama08IphoneApp Firstly the campaign produced an Obama'08 iPhone App.  The brilliance of this app was that it ordered your contact by importance of location within the battleground states.  So your friends from Florida, Pennsylvania and Ohio would be listed at the top.  As a supporter the expectation is you'd call them and encourage them to vote Democrat.  The App monitored your calls an uploaded the data to the Chicago HQ so that the other Democrat phonebanks didn't bother your friends.  Brilliant.

Secondly Jim was asked what they would do without the money, if they only had 10% of the budget to spend.  He answered, "The Digital Space is the place to begin, because that is where the conversation starts."

His six lessons from the campaign were:

  • Know what you stand for
  • Be disciplined and consistent
  • Meet people where they are
  • Take risks
  • Use integrated communications and use technology
  • Speed matters

An excellent morning and thanks to GMMB for organisingit.

June 22, 2009

Young People and Politics on Radio One

Last night on The Surgery, Radio One dedicated an hour to talking about young people and politics. 

Much of what was said reflects the experience we have through I'm Councillor in that young people do care about issues but not party politics.  A lack of clear information and good communication from politicians were major obstacles to a positive view of politics.

A couple of callers suggested setting up a party for young people.  A misguided view in my opinion as it assumes young people are all alike and that certainly isn't the case.

Votes at 16 had pretty much unanimous support as you'd expect.

Towards the end of the show they had a fellow called Shane McCracken on to talk about an online event that gets young people and their councillors talking (Politics conversation starts at one hour and my bit was at 1:46).  The event is called I'm a Councillor, Get me out of here!  Sounds interesting ;-)


June 16, 2009

Lord Drayson engages with the masses on twitter

Cross-posted from our I'm a Scientist blog: Is this the first time that a serving government minister has debated his role and the organisation of government, with random interested parties, on twitter?

Some people love twitter, some think it's a load of pointless old nonsense. I confess, I've got into it and think it's very handy (my feed is @imascientist, if you're interested). But this afternoon I've seen about the best thing I've ever seen on it.

Various sciencey type people had been expressing their worries about the new cabinet arrangements, specifically that Lord Drayson was now joint Minister for Science and Minister for Defence Procurement.

Some people felt that science wasn't being taken seriously enough, with only 'half a minister'. Some people were concerned by the 'synergy' of science and defence technology. Pretty straightforward gossip about the situation, which in other circumstances might have been around the watercooler and gone no further...

But then something amazing happened. Lord Drayson sent the following message in his twitter feed:-

"Please explain specifically what it is you are worried about. I'm listening..."

PD_Smith, in particular, took up the baton, and Lord Drayson actually engaged in a conversation about it! I've editted together most of the conversation below, so those who weren't watching it can see it. I've not included everything, and I've not put things in strictly chronological order, where it would be confusing (sometimes it seemed obvious that delays meant that remarks which should go together were separated). Apologies to people I've missed out and if I've changed the sense of what anyone meant.

lorddrayson: @joergheber Please explain specifically what it is you are worried about. I'm listening... @rowanNS @skyponderer @PD_Smith
PD_Smith: @lorddrayson 1. why does Science not deserve its own minister? 2. Are there not ethical issues re unifying sci + military under 1 minister?
skyponderer: @lorddrayson Justify why we need a shared role Don't we have enough talent to go round that we need to spread it thinly @ science's expense?
lorddrayson: @PD_Smith In my view the more the sci minister is connected to wider roles in govt the more influence science has to the whole agenda
2020science: @skyponderer One up to @lorddrayson I think :-) Round two...
PD_Smith: @lorddrayson The logic of that is that you'll soon be taking on more portfolios? Sounds to me like a reduction in the import of sci.
lorddrayson: @PD_Smith Science deserves a minister at the cabinet table. Thats key. Tick. Sci desrves a cabinet committee. Thats key too. Tick.
lorddrayson: @PD_Smith But, many ministers have dual roles.. it really helps departments work together better. Silos in whitehall are not helpful.
lorddrayson: @PD_Smith Many science issues are cross-departmental. Take GMES as an example. MOD / DECC / BERR / DIUS all had a view on earth observation
2020science: @lorddrayson Dedication to strategic value of science & technology encouraging. But also need to translate intentions into action.
PD_Smith: @lorddrayson And what about combining sci + defence procurement? Does it send out the right message in an age of nuclear proliferation?
lorddrayson: @PD_Smith Re ethical issues. You have a point. I have to be absolutely clear on the separation between the 2 roles. Civil service r key.
lorddrayson: @PD_Smith However, many science breakthroughs originated in defence research: ultrasound, radar to mention 2
joergheber: @lorddrayson worried abt role of science and thinking behind reorg. Why talk of ring fence? Are these threats to budget? Sounds defensive?
imascientist: @lorddrayson @PD_Smith But is there a risk sci gets 'pulled' in a military direction? Potential crossovers w othr depts instead, e.g. health
PD_Smith: .@lorddrayson That's undeniable. But science should, and can be, about so much more than military hardware.
PD_Smith: @lorddrayson I'm v glad to hear you accept there has to be separation. But I still say it sends out a mixed message to the rest of the world
alicebell: @lorddrayson. Er, isn't that the point? People aren't sure that science and defence are the departments they want working together
skyponderer: @lorddrayson Does science not have enough value on its own to be at heart of govt, why does it have to piggy-back in on defence's shoulders?
lorddrayson: @skyponderer Its not at science's expense- v. imp to be integrated into heart of govt- gives mores influence & impact 2 sci agenda
lorddrayson: @PD_Smith I agree. Defence is but a small part of the whole. "Science so what; So everything"....will continue from BIS... @sciencesowhat
dr_david_w: @lorddrayson @PD_Smith @skyponderer Gordon Brown wanted a debate on the role of science in service of humanity. His actions speak volumes.
lorddrayson: @imascientist the spinoffs in health are key - which is why I head the Office for Life Sciences too.
imascientist: @lorddrayson But as @alicebell suggests, it seems to send an odd message - as if defence apps are the *main point* of science.
lorddrayson: @imascientist @alicebell Not the main point. Just one of many, many , applications of sci. MoD R&D budget is one of the largest tho...
PD_Smith: Intrigued to hear that @lorddrayson heads the Office for Life Sciences & Defence Procurement. That seems almost oxymoronic...
joergheber: @lorddrayson yet Andy Grove's quote works both ways as we can see :) Deeds speak louder than words so look forward to the former. Good luck!
lorddrayson: I really believe science agenda is stronger now in govt than ever. Its up to me to prove it though in the future. @tim_harper @joergheber
joergheber: @tim_harper @lorddrayson that's exactly my concern- science seems a fragile commodity in the scheme of gov. Shouldn't be on the defensive!
lorddrayson: @joergheber Pure research is safe.. read my speech at FST
2020science: @lorddrayson Internal multiple roles for ministers seems pragmatic. But it does lead to mixed/confusing messages to those outside govt.
skyponderer: @lorddrayson Hats off for the chance for dialogue. Very impressed we can all chat to the Minister for Science about such key issues
imascientist: @lorddrayson I don't want to sound like we're all ganging up on you. Kudos for discussing it!
imascientist: @lorddrayson Maybe I'm an old hippy, but I try to engage kids in science, hoping they'll cure cancer or save planet. Weapons, not so much...
PD_Smith: @lorddrayson @imascientist @alicebell Indeed - what would Michael Foot think of that? Great pity...
timeshighered: @lorddrayson - Your new role seems to be getting a few queries...would you like to write an opinion article for us defending your new brief?
lorddrayson: @timeshighered Delighted... thanks for the offer. Lets do it.
PD_Smith: I have to say, chatting w/ the Minister for Sci & Defence Procurement is one of the most intriguing Twitter experiences I have had to date.

I don't think that Lord Drayson has completely answered his critics, but I think it's extremely admirable that he entered the conversation and was so game about it. And I'm truly impressed at such government openness.

It ends with a cheeky request for Lord Drayson to write an article for the Times Higher Education supplement, which he agrees to. So you can read all about it there soon!

June 10, 2009

Democratic Renewal Council - where are the people?

Gordon Brown has announced a National Democratic Renewal Council.  According to this Guardian report it seemingly consists of a sub-committee of the cabinet chaired by the Prime Minister that will invite expert witnesses from outside.

Others have said that Westminster cannot change itself.  I blogged about Etienne Chouard, a French activist who helped bring about the French "Non" against the European Constitution in 2005. His fifth rule of writing a constitution is:

A Constitution is not something granted by those in power, it is drawn up by the People itself, precisely to protect itself from the arbitrary use of power, through a Constituent Assembly, independent, elected for that purpose only and afterwards revoked.


If we are going to have a serious attempt at rebuilding trust in the democratic process in the UK, Westminster needs to realise that it is not going to come from within, least of all within a very select elite of ministers within Government.

A true National Democratic Renewal Council (and I vote for a different name) needs to come from the people.  Citizen Jury, Citizen Summit, Independent Inquiry, perhaps.  Anything but an internal government body.

June 04, 2009

Twitter in the Classroom

Nice video about a history professor in the States using Twitter as a way of holding class discussions with 90 students.  They found out a lot of the same things that we've discovered with I'm a Councillor, I'm a Scientist and ConferenceXtra - being able to contribute digitally suits some people better than having to talk in front of 100 people. And the trail of comments allows people to follow up at a later date.

Jeremy Hardy likened Q&A sessions at literary festivals to Guardian reader karaoke.  Some people do like to go on under the pretence of asking a question.  140 characters puts the focus on conciseness.

(h/t on video to Paul Canning)

May 19, 2009

J'aime la Tour

VisitBlackpool have created a short film and published it on YouTube. Just shy of 27,000 and 200 comments it has certainly sparked some interest.

The film itself hasn't got me looking for a hotel to stay, but it does make me feel more positive to the town.  The folk there have a sense of humour.  Lovely.

May 01, 2009

Conversation happen where the people are

Chris-Ward Facebook I'm often advising councils that conversations happen in the community and they can't force them to happen where they want them to happen. 

We've suffered from this in the past couple of days.  Having posted a 3 minute video about I'm a Councillor on YouTube we were keeping our fingers crossed for a few people to leave a comment about how fab it was before promoting it to a wider audience.  We sent the link to a few key people including Chris Ward the councillor who appears in it.  Chris did the right thing and promoted the video on his Facebook page and sure enough the comments started flying in.  On his Facebook page. 

Not really a surprise as people were never going to click from Facebook to YouTube to leave a comment for our sake, but a useful reminder that conversations happen where the people are and not where you might want them too.



April 30, 2009

Election poster

The European Parliament have released a set of posters to encourage us to vote in the European elections on June 2nd.  I liked this one.  Made me think about what my choice would be.
Credit: European Parliament



One slight gripe.  The posters have been uploaded to Flickr with all rights reserved.  This means I shouldn't be using it here, but I'm guessing they really do want people to be talking about it.

April 28, 2009

Discrimination against young people happens, and it's not on

No hoodies"The provisions will not cover people under 18. It is right to treat children and young people differently, for example through age limits on alcohol consumption, and there is little evidence of harmful age discrimination against young people." [my italics]

Harriet Harman, Minister for Women and Equality


The Equality Bill was published on Monday. One of it's provisions is to outlaw age discrimination for those over 18. As the quote from Harriet Harman indicates, the government have assumed that young people aren't affected by age discrimination, so we didn't need to bother about them.

In I'm a Councillor we see thousands of questions, and tens of thousands of lines of chat, from a broad spectrum of young people. It's very clear from this that young people are often discriminated against, and that it makes many feel marginalised and excluded from society. If shops had signs that said, 'only two black people in this shop at any time' we'd be outraged (and quite rightly). But no-one bats an eyelid at similar signs about school children.

Young people are frequently treated with suspicion by adults and excluded from public spaces. Shopkeepers follow them round the shop or exclude them. Old ladies cross the road to avoid them and glare at them as if they are muggers. They get hassled by police and moved on just for hanging around a street corner doing nothing, when there's few other places for them to go. Police officers routinely order them to remove their hoods. Remember, nearly all of these young people are as blameless as you and I.

Being constantly distrusted and harrassed, with no recourse, no way of saying, 'that isn't fair', just because you are young, has to affect young people's happiness and sense of belonging. I can't help thinking that those years of exclusion do not lead to healthy, happy, balanced adults, or a healthy, happy, cohesive society.

I've had conversations with people in other professions who have no idea of the kind of thing that happens to young people, or the way they feel about it. Sometimes they just don't believe me. That's not that surprising, we live in an age-segregated society and there are few young people's voices in the mainstream.

But I would have thought that the Government Equalities Office would be a little bit more informed on the matter. And if they didn't know about it, you'd think they would try to find out - like maybe ask the Children's Rights Alliance, or the Children's Commissioner.

It's not really good enough to say 'there is little evidence', when what you mean is, you assumed there isn't and so you didn't look for it. Especially when you are drafting a wholesale overhaul of equalities legislation in the country.

Fortunately, the Young Equals coalition have stepped up to the plate and today published their report, 'Making the case: why children should be protected from age discrimination and how it can be done' (pdf). They give some of the evidence the Equalities Office missed about discrimination against young people, and what can be done about it. We commend their report to you and hope that the government listens.

Photo Credit: Creative Commons, Claire L. Evans

April 23, 2009

I'm a Councillor goes to the movies!

That's right, get your popcorn ready (although you'll need to eat it quite quickly). We've made a short film about the event, to help show people what it's like.

A council officer who was briefing her councillors before the event once said to me, 'I'm a Councillor is a great idea, and really simple, but sometimes when you try to explain it it starts sounding really complicated'. Hopefully this film will make it much easier to explain to people, and it gets across the excitement of young people in the classroom, and of councillors and teachers too!

*If you can't see the film (usually because YouTube is blocked by your council servers) then get in touch and we'll send you a DVD.

*If you'd like to sign up for more info then click here and give us your details.

The young people we filmed were really lovely. During the live chat shown in the film, they were teasing the teacher about putting on make-up and doing her hair specially. But then they confided to me online that 'Miss looks really nice actually'.

The video was filmed by Catherine Seymour and Mark Barrs at St Peter's School in Guildford and editted by Katie Barlow.

From our project blogs

Our projects

  • Life Swap

    LifeSwap helps to bridge the gap between disparate groups such as councillors and young people.

  • I'm a Councillor, Get me out of Here!

    IAC has run for 5 years helping councillors engage with thousands of young people in 63 councils across the country.

  • Local e-Democracy National Project

    Gallomanor has produced the majority of the marketing communication pieces for the Local e-Democracy National Project.

  • CampaignCreator

    CampaignCreator is an online resource that allows grassroots campaigners to create and manage effective and credible campaign communications.

  • Your Say Your Way

    Your Say Your Way was a highly effective voter education campaign used to show residents of two wards in St Albans how to use new electronic voting systems being piloted in 2002.

  • Juror Online


    A virtual walkthrough for Jurors commissioned by the Home Office.